Sanctuary in the city? Reframing responses to protracted urban displacement

Simone Haysom
June 2013
Overview

In 2010, half of the world’s refugees and internally displaced people (IDPs) were thought to be in urban areas, many of them in protracted displacement with little likelihood of ever returning home. Yet the implications of protracted urban displacement have not been given due weight by an international aid and governance system that has historically focused its displacement responses on rural camps.

This policy brief draws on findings from the three year DANIDA-funded Sanctuary in the City project to argue protracted urban displacement requires fundamental changes in approaches to the urban displaced and host societies. It outlines both the programmatic and political challenges that are raised for humanitarian agencies and argues that reframing responses to urban displacement will also involve local and national governments, and human rights and development actors. Narratives around protracted urban displacement must also change to reflect the ingenuity and fortitude displaced populations typically display, the opportunities for safety and self-sufficiency that urban areas represent and the contribution that the displaced can make to host societies.

This publication is an output of the following project: Sanctuary in the city? Urban displacement and vulnerability
Language: 
English
Downloads

Sanctuary in the city? Reframing responses to protracted urban displacement

Sanctuary in the city? Reframing responses to protracted urban displacement
Sanctuary in the city? Reframing responses to protracted urban displacement - pdf, 218.27k
Video