Aiding reform: lessons on what works, what doesn't, and why

2 June 2014 13:00 - 17:00 GMT+01 (BST)
Round-table

​Speakers:

Alina Rocha Menocal, Overseas Development Institute

Verena Fritz, World Bank

David BoothOverseas Development Institute

Sue Unsworth, The Policy Practice

Mark SegalUK Department for International Development

David Hudson, University College London

Claire Leigh, Budget Strengthening Initiative

Brian Levy, John Hopkins University / University of Cape Town 

Discussants:

Stefan Kossoff, UK Department for International Development

Chairs:

Leni WildOverseas Development Institute

Marta ForestiOverseas Development Institute

Description

Many development agencies increasingly acknowledge that aid is more likely to be effective, and less likely to do harm, when it is politically well-informed. Yet getting better informed and more sophisticated analysis on the political dimensions of development has proven easier than changing aid practices to be consistent with the insights gained. In other words, development agencies seem to find it hard to move from thinking politically to working differently. There is, therefore, growing demand for examples of what ‘working differently’ entails in practice. This evidence needs to show that it is feasible, given the constraints under which aid agencies operate, and that it does indeed produce better results than more traditional, politics-blind aid programming. In much of the discussion until now, the evidence base in this respect has seemed rather slim.

This event presented selected case studies where better outcomes have been achieved by thinking politically and working differently, and analysed their common features. Discussion also centred on how identifying practical ways to overcome existing obstacles to better practice in development agencies.

Download the summary here.